Contact Information


2200 Wells Fargo Center
90 S. Seventh Street

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

D: +1 612 766 8138
F: +1 612 766 1600


University of Chicago Law School
J.D., with high honors, Order of the Coif, Law Review (articles editor) (1999)
University of Minnesota, Morris
B.A., with high distinction, with honors (1996)

Bar Admissions


Court Admissions

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. Supreme Court

Meet Aaron Van Oort

Aaron D. Van Oort


Aaron Van Oort is a legal strategist, class action litigator, and appellate lawyer who co-chairs the Faegre Baker Daniels appellate advocacy group. Before joining the firm, Aaron clerked for Justice Antonin Scalia at the United States Supreme Court and for Chief Judge Richard Posner at the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Appellate Advocacy

Aaron has represented clients in nine of the 13 United States Courts of Appeal, as well as in the United States Supreme Court and in state appellate courts. In recent appeals, he has successfully obtained reversals of jury verdicts in both federal and state courts, Vaidyanathan v. Seagate US LLC , 691 F.3d 972 (8th Cir. 2012); Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc. 2015 WL 5194755 (Minn. App. Sept. 8, 2015), and successfully obtained reversal of an order denying leave the right to intervene in litigation, National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. U.S. E.P.A., 759 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2014). His appellate clients have included General Mills, Seagate, the NFL, Bank of America, Capital One, U.S. Bank, Wells Fargo, Koch Industries and Xcel Energy.

Class Action Defense

Aaron leads class-action defense teams across the country. In recent cases, he won summary judgment on behalf of the National Football League (NFL) against retired players' publicity-rights claims, Dryer v. National Football League, Civ. No. 09-2182, Slip Op. (D. Minn. Oct. 10, 2014), negotiated and secured final approval of a nationwide class settlement in MDL litigation involving the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, In re: Capital One Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation, 80 F. Supp. 3d 781 (N.D. Ill. 2015), defeated certification of a putative California class seeking to certify employment classification claims, Juarez v. Jani-King , 273 F.R.D. 571 (N.D. Cal. 2011), and won dismissal of a putative nationwide class alleging consumer fraud claims, Taradejna v. General Mills, Inc. , 909 F.Supp.2d 1128 (D. Minn. 2012). He is currently representing both the National Football League (NFL) and the National Hockey League (NHL) in putative class actions. His class-action clients have included Google, the NFL, the NHL, Capital One, General Mills, Jani-King International, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bank, American Family Insurance, Koch Industries and Life Time Fitness.


Representative cases that Aaron has briefed or argued on appeal include:

  • Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc., 2015 WL 5194755 (Minn. App. Sept. 8, 2015). Representing Cirrus, successfully obtained reversal of $10 million jury verdict on non-disparagement claim, with direction to enter judgment for Cirrus.
  • Marshall v. National Football League, 787 F.3d 502 (8th Cir. 2015). Representing the National Football League, successfully defended final approval of a class settlement of publicity-rights claims against multiple objectors.
  • Nicaj v. Shoe Carnival, Inc., 768 F.3d 622 (7th Cir. 2014). Representing Shoe Carnival, successfully defended Rule 12 dismissal of putative FACTA class actions.
  • National Parks Conservation Ass'n v. U.S. E.P.A., 759 F.3d 969 (8th Cir. 2014). Representing Xcel Energy, successfully obtained reversal of order denying right to intervene in environmental litigation.
  • Keiran v. Home Capital, Inc., 720 F.3d 721 (8th Cir. 2013), abrogated, 135 S. Ct. 790 (2015). Representing Home Capital, successfully defended award of summary judgment on TILA claims over the opposition of the CFPB.
  • Kolmar Americas, Inc. v. Koch Supply & Trading LP, 512 Fed. Appx. 84 (2d Cir. 2013). Representing Koch, successfully defended award of summary judgment in complex contract dispute.
  • Vaidyanathan v. Seagate US LLC , 691 F.3d 972 (8th Cir. 2012). Representing Seagate, successfully won reversal of jury verdict on employment claim that plaintiff had obtained through an incorrect jury instruction.
  • Brady v. NFL, 638 F.3d 1004, 640 F.3d 785, 644 F.3d 661 (8th Cir. 2011). Representing the NFL, successfully stayed and then reversed antitrust preliminary injunction against the NFL's player lockout.
  • Clifford v. Crop Production Services, Inc., 627 F.3d 268 (7th Cir. 2010).  Successfully defended complete grant of summary for Crop Production Services against crop damages claims.
  • Siemens AG v. Seagate Technology, 369 Fed. Appx. 118 (Fed. Cir. 2010). In a billion-dollar patent case, successfully defended complete defense verdict and judgment of invalidity on appeal.
  • Krueger v. Zeman Constr. Co., 781 N.W.2d 858 (Minn. 2010). Successfully defended dismissal of business discrimination claim, persuading Minnesota Supreme Court to limit the cause of action to the parties to the contract.
  • Savig v. First Nat'l Bank of Omaha, 781 N.W.2d 335 (Minn. 2010). On behalf of amici curiae Capital One, successfully persuaded Minnesota Supreme Court to allow banks to garnish joint bank accounts without fear of common law tort liability.


  • Minnesota Lawyer — Attorneys of the Year, 2015
  • Faegre Baker Daniels — Baker Benson Pro Bono Award, 2015
  • Best Lawyers in America — Appellate Law, 2012-16; Antitrust Litigation, 2013, 2015-16
  • Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business — Litigation: Appellate, 2010-15
  • Minnesota Super Lawyers — Appellate, 2013-15; Rising Star, Business Litigation, 2008-12
  • Minnesota Lawyer — Up & Coming Attorney, 2007

Professional Associations

  • Minnesota State Bar Association — Vice Chair of Appellate Section


  • U.S. Supreme Court, Hon. Antonin Scalia, 2000-01
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, Hon. Richard A. Posner, 1999-2000


  • Supreme Court Review
    Panelist, Colorado Law, July 2015
  • Consumer Finance Class Action Litigation and Settlement Trends and New and Emerging Procedural Considerations
    Panelist, American Conference Institute's 23rd National Conference on Consumer Finance Class Actions & Litigation, July 2015
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's Big New Decisions
    Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2013
  • Recent Developments in Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) Litigation
    Banking Law Institute, Minneapolis, 2013
  • Unclaimed Property and the Life Insurance Industry
    NOLHGA Legal Seminar, Boston, 2012
  • They Have No Class: Strategies for Dealing With Class Action Litigation
    Complex Litigation Seminar, Minneapolis, 2010
  • Petitioning for Review in the United States Supreme Court
    Third Annual Appellate Practice Institute, Minnesota CLE, 2009
  • Defending FACTA Class Actions
    Eighth Annual Conference on Consumer Finance Class Actions & Litigation, American Conference Institute, New York, NY, 2009
  • Common Law and Statutory Fraud — Establishing Credibility Through Surgical Analysis and Pleading
    Minnesota CLE, 2008
  • The Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act: A Case Law Update
    Minnesota CLE, 2005
  • Class Action Point and Counterpoint
    Hennepin County Bar Association, 2004
  • Consumer Fraud
    Minnesota Institute of Legal Education, 2003

Published Articles

  • Certiorari Practice in the U.S. Supreme Court
    Chapter co-author, Eighth Circuit Appellate Practice Manual, 7th ed., 2016
  • ABA Appellate Practice Compendium
    Contributing Author, 2013
  • Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Trade Practice Regulation in Minnesota
    Contributing Editor
  • 8th Circuit Appellate Practice Manual
    Contributing Editor, 6th Edition, 2013


Transmission of information to us via this feature does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Do not send any information that you would have treated confidentially.