Contact Information


2200 Wells Fargo Center
90 S. Seventh Street

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

T: +1 612 766 8043
F: +1 612 766 1600


Case Western Reserve University
J.D., magna cum laude (2004)
Calvin College
B.A., National Merit Scholar, Pi Sigma Alpha (1999)

Bar Admissions

Minnesota Ohio

Court Admissions

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Erin L. Hoffman


Erin Hoffman is a litigator and appellate lawyer who defends class and individual consumer claims. She has worked with many of the largest financial system institutions in the country, including Capital One, U.S. Bank and Wells Fargo.

She has successfully defended clients against a variety of consumer claims and has developed a particular expertise in defending claims brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. She also defended claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Credit Billing Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Truth in Lending Act, as well as state consumer-protection laws.

Erin represents clients across the United States and has litigated cases in state and federal courts in California, Connecticut, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Representative Cases

  • Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Boedigheimer, 2013 WL 6569956 (Minn. Ct. App. Dec. 16, 2013). Representing Wells Fargo, successfully defended award of summary judgment.
  • Daniel v. Bluestem Brands, Inc., 2014 WL 81763 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 9, 2014). Representing Bluestem Brands, successfully moved to dismiss FCRA and state common-law claims.
  • In re: Capital One Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litig., 908 F. Supp. 2d 1366 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Representing Capital One, successfully sought consolidation for pretrial proceedings of three putative class actions and dozens of individual actions alleging claims under the TCPA.
  • Bohnhoff v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 853 F. Supp. 2d 849 (D. Minn. 2012). Representing Wells Fargo, successfully moved to dismiss claims under the Minnesota Residential Originator and Servicing Licensing Act as preempted under the National Bank Act, as well as state common-law claims.
  • Lansing v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2011 WL 6754083 (D. Minn. Dec. 23, 2011). Representing Wells Fargo, successfully obtained partial dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on claims under the FDCPA and Minnesota Consumer Fraud Act.
  • Bazil v. Wells Fargo Bank, 2011 WL 4442835 (D. Minn. Sept. 22, 2011). Representing Wells Fargo, obtained complete dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on claims challenging foreclosure. Court held majority of claims were preempted by Home Owners' Loan Act and remainder failed as a matter of law.

Prior to joining the firm, Erin clerked for the Honorable Matthew E. Johnson, Minnesota Court of Appeals. During law school, she clerked for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio and served as judicial extern to the Honorable Donald C. Nugent of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

Professional Associations

  • Minnesota State Bar Association—Appellate Practice and Consumer Litigation Sections


  • Minnesota Court of Appeals, Hon. Matthew E. Johnson, 2008-10


  • Recent Developments in Credit Card and TCPA Litigation
    10th Annual Banking Law Institute, Minneapolis, 2013
  • The ABCs of Federal Consumer Credit Protection
    Minnesota State Bar Association, Minneapolis, 2012
  • How to Respond to a Qualified Written Request (QWR)
    Iowa CLE, 2011


Transmission of information to us via this feature does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Do not send any information that you would have treated confidentially.