Marc Levy focuses his practice on trademark, advertising and unfair competition litigation and enforcement. Marc has represented clients in these matters, including preliminary injunction hearings and trials, in federal trial and appellate courts across the country. In the advertising arena, Marc has not only represented clients in the federal courts, but also at the National Advertising Division of the Better Business Bureau. Marc also handles opposition and cancellation proceedings at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

• Co-counsel for Ultreo, Inc. in successful defeat of motion for preliminary injunction by Procter & Gamble against maker of new ultrasonic power toothbrush (Procter & Gamble v. Ultreo, Inc., S.D.N.Y.)
• Represented Crocs in trade dress and design patent infringement case against maker of knock-off products (Crocs v. Australia Unlimited, D. Col.)
• Represented maker of Sonicare toothbrush in jury trial of false advertising lawsuit against Gillette, the manufacturer of the competing Braun–Oral B product (Braun v. Optiva, S.D.N.Y.)
• Obtained summary judgment for Target dismissing trademark infringement claims by Payless Shoe Source regarding use of "Get More. Pay Less." (Payless ShoeSource v. Target Brands, D. Kan.)
• Obtained summary judgment dismissing trademark infringement claim by maker of Bowflex exercise gym against longstanding Body Flex breathing and exercise program (Nautilus v. Savvier, W.D. Wash.)
• Co-trial counsel for Thermos, Inc. in jury trial in which Thermos obtained verdict dismissing claim of trade dress infringement made by owner of Stanley brand insulated bottle (Pacific Marketing v. Thermos, W.D. Wash.)
• Represented pharmaceutical company in prosecution of trademark infringement action against competing vitamin product (Everett Labs. v. Vertical Pharm., D.N.J.)
• Defeated motion for preliminary injunction by maker of Wet ‘N' Wild cosmetics sought against maker of Wild and Crazy cosmetics (Markwins Beauty Products v. Mirage Cosmetics, C.D. Cal.)
• Represented Microsoft in prosecution of trademark infringement action against manufacturer of LindowsOS operating system (Microsoft v. Lindows.com, W.D. Wash.)

• International Trademark Association
• American Bar Association
• Washington State Bar Association
• Colorado Bar Association

• Hon. Daniel A. Moore, Jr., Alaska Supreme Court (1989-90)

• Red Flags in False Advertising
  Rocky Mountain Intellectual Property Institute, Colorado Bar Association, Denver, Colorado, May (2009)
• Fraud on the Trademark Office After In re Bose: Can Trademark Owners Stop Worrying Now?
  Practicing Law Institute, National Webinar, September (2009)
• Trademark Enforcement
  International Business Briefing, Faegre & Benson, Denver, Colorado and Minneapolis Minnesota, October (2008)
• Advertising Law: A Primer
  IP Law for the Non-IP Lawyer, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, Washington, September (2008)
• Kate Spode & Louis Buitton: Combating International Counterfeiting
  Rocky Mountain Intellectual Property Institute, Colorado Bar Association, Denver, Colorado, June (2008)
• Legislative Trends in Regulating Video Game Content
  Gamer Technology Conference (LSI), Seattle, Washington, July (2005)
• Washington's Competition and Consumer Protection Act and Section 5 of the FTC Act
  Unfair Competition and Consumer Protection Conference, Washington State Bar Asoc., November (2002)