David J.F. Gross

Contact Information

david.gross@FaegreBD.com2200 Wells Fargo Center
90 S. Seventh Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-3901
T: +1 612 766 7804
F: +1 612 766 1600

Practices

Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Litigation

Industries

Medical Technology

Education

Harvard Law School
J.D., magna cum laude (1989)University of Minnesota
B.A., summa cum laude (1985)

Bar Admissions

Minnesota

Court Admissions

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota U.S. Supreme Court

Profile Experience News & Media Events

David J.F. Gross

Partner

David Gross is a trial lawyer.

In 2007, David's winning trial record led the American Lawyer to name him one of the top 50 litigators in the United States under the age of 45. In 2008, the National Law Journal recognized David's complete defense jury verdict in a patent infringement jury trial in Orange County, California, as one of the top 10 trial victories in the United States. The Minnesota Lawyer has thrice named David an "Attorney of the Year" based on trial victories in 2003, 2008 and 2011, and David is one of only a handful of lawyers who has been named to Minnesota Lawyer's "Circle of Excellence" based on his winning trial record. David has been recognized as a top IP trial lawyer by Best Lawyers in America, Benchmark Litigators, Chambers USA, IP Law & Business and Super Lawyers. He has also been named by Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) as one of the World's Leading Patent Litigators and one of the World's Leading Patent Practitioners.

David's representative trials include:

Winning a jury verdict for Coloplast against a start-up competitor in Coloplast v. Generic Medical Device Company (W.D. Wash. 2012), a patent infringement jury trial in Tacoma, Washington, involving a surgical method for treating stress urinary incontinence. Following the jury verdict, the Court entered an injunction prohibiting the start-up company from distributing infringing products. The company ceased all business operations within 90 days of the verdict.
Winning a defense jury verdict for Benchmark Electronics in Power Paper v. Benchmark Electronics (D. Minn. 2011), a $20 million breach-of-contract jury trial involving patented, ultra-thin battery technology. The trial victory led Minnesota Lawyer to name David an "Attorney of the Year" for 2011.
Winning a defense jury verdict of anticipation and obviousness for Seagate Technology in Siemens v. Seagate Technology (C.D. Cal. 2008), a patent infringement jury trial in Orange County, California, involving the world's leading hard disc drive technology. The trial victory was reported in IP Law360 and led the National Law Journal to name David one of the Top Ten Winning Litigators for 2008.
Winning a $6.75 million jury verdict for a former 3M business in Global Traffic v. Tomar Electronics (D. Minn. 2008), a patent infringement jury trial involving the world's leading traffic preemption technology. The trial victory led Minnesota Lawyer to name David an Attorney of the Year for 2008.
Winning a trial and permanent injunction for Wyeth (now Pfizer) in Wyeth v. Natural Biologics (D. Minn. 2003), a trade secret misappropriation trial involving the billion-dollar drug Premarin. The trial victory was reported by the National Law Journal and led the Minnesota Lawyer to name David an Attorney of the Year for 2003.

In addition to his jury trial experience, David has successfully argued several appeals before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

David's representative oral arguments include:

In Middleton v. 3M (Fed. Cir. 2013), David argued before the Federal Circuit on behalf of 3M. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal for lack of standing of a patent case against 3M that had been pending for several years. The patent asserted against 3M involved floor-finishing materials.
In TimeBase v. Thomson Reuters (Fed. Cir. 2012), David argued before the Federal Circuit on behalf of Thomson Reuters. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment order of non-infringement. The patents asserted against Thomson Reuters involved multidimensional database technology.
In Rembrandt v. Seagate Technology (Fed. Cir. 2012), David argued before the Federal Circuit on behalf of Seagate Technology. The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's summary judgment order of non-infringement. The patent asserted against Seagate Technology involved coils used in thin-film recording heads.

David is a co-author of NITA's The Power Trial Method and the casebook Winning Patent Litigation. He is a national lecturer on trial advocacy and IP litigation.

Prior to joining Faegre Baker Daniels, David was a litigator in Washington, D.C., serving as a trial attorney in the Honors Program of the United States Department of Justice, a litigation associate at Covington & Burling, and a litigation associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom.

David is head of the firm's intellectual property litigation practice.

Pro Bono

Hurricane Katrina Evacuees National Report — Lead Attorney

Honors

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM )1000: The World's Leading Patent Practitioners, 2012
Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) 250: The World's Leading Patent Litigators, 2011
National Law Journal — Top 10 Winning Litigators, 2009
Minnesota Lawyer — Named an Attorney of the Year, 2003 and 2008
The American Lawyer — Litigation's Rising Stars, 2008
Super Lawyers — Intellectual Property Litigation, 2005-12
Chambers USA: America's Leading Lawyers for Business — Litigation: IP, 2005-12
The Best Lawyers in America — Intellectual Property Law, 2008-12; Patent Litigation, 2013
Benchmark Litigation — Intellectual Property, 2013
Managing IP — IP Star, 2013
New Mexico State Bar National Speaker Award, 2007

Civic Activities

William Mitchell Law School — IP Institute Advisory Board
University of Minnesota Law School — Adjunct Professor
University of Minnesota College of Liberal Arts Alumni Society — Past President
University of Minnesota Career Guidance Programs — Lecturer

Clerkships

U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, Hon. Levin H. Campbell, 1990

Presentations

How to Survive Your First Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, April 2013
Yes, I Can! How to Project Confidence as a New Lawyer
Minnesota CLE New Lawyer Experience, Minneapolis, January 2013
How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2012
Even Rocket Science Is Not Rocket Science: The Utter Simplicity of a Patent Trial
Practising Law Institute, Chicago, 2011
How to Win Your Next Trial Using the Power Trial Method
Massachusetts CLE, Boston, 2011
How to Win Your Next Trial Using the Power Trial Method
Ohio State Bar Association, Columbus, 2011
How to Win Your Next Trial Using the Power Trial Method
Ohio State Bar Association, Cleveland, 2011
Patent Reform and Recent Trends in Patent Disputes: New Legislation, Court Decisions and Administrative Changes and How They Affect Business Models and Practice
Patent Disputes 2011: New Models for A New Market, Santa Clara, 2011
You're Killing Me: How to Prevent Your Expert Witness From Destroying Your Patent Case at Trial
Practising Law Institute, Chicago, 2011
IP Series: The New Patent Reform Act
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2011
How to Win Your Next Trial Using the Power Trial Method
Alaska Bar Association, Anchorage, 2011
Annual Bar Conference: How the Great Recession Has Affected the Practice of Law and Our Legal System
South Carolina Bar Association, Trial Section, Hilton Head, 2011
Trends in Patent Jury Trials
AIPLA Electronic Computer Patent Law Summit, Minneapolis, 2011
The Art of Trying Patent Jury Trials
Federal Bar Association, Minneapolis, 2011
How to SURVIVE Your First Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2011
The Corporate Litigation Tool Kit
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2011
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2011
All Hands Meeting: Inventors on Trial
Silicon Valley Association of General Counsel, Santa Clara, 2010
The Science, Law and Art of Demonstrative Exhibits in Patent Cases
Practising Law Institute, New York, 2010
Complex Litigation Summit
Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, 2010
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Massachusetts CLE, Boston, 2010
Annual Bar Conference: How the Great Recession Has Affected the Practice of Law and Our Legal System
New Mexico Bar Association, Ruidoso, 2010
New Lawyer Experience: How to Approach Your Legal Career in the Era of the Great Recession
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2010
Corporate and Expert Depositions
Minnesota CLE Webcasts, Minneapolis, 2010
Advanced Patent Litigation
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2010
How to SURVIVE Your First Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2010
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take & Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2010
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2009
The Secret of a Good Bluff Is Not to Bluff
Practising Law Institute, New York, 2009
How to Win Your Next Trial
University Intra Americana Law School of Puerto Rico, San Juan, 2009
The Secret of a Good Bluff Is Not to Bluff
Practising Law Institute, Chicago, 2009
Midwest IP Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2009
Midwest IP Institute: Perfect Oral Advocacy
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2009
The Art of Cross Examination
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2009
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2009
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, New York, 2008
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, Chicago, 2008
The Art of Cross Examination
Washington CLE, Seattle, 2008
Midwest IP Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2008
KSR Patent Wars
Association of General Counsel, Silicon Valley, 2008
Patent Enforcement and Defense
Virginia CLE, Alexandria, 2009
Litigation After KSR
USPTO, Alexandria, 2008
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2008
Patent Enforcement and Defense
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2008
The Art of Cross Examination
Arizona CLE, Phoenix, 2008
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Pennsylvania Bar Institute, Pittsburgh, 2008
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Pennsylvania Bar Institute, Philadelphia, 2008
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2008
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Tennessee CLE, Nashville, 2007
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, New York, 2007
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, Chicago, 2007
Midwest IP Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2007
Annual Bar Conference: Success as a Lawyer
New Mexico State Bar, Mescalero, 2007
The Art of Cross Examination
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2007
KSR v. Teleflex
Minnesota CLE Webcast, Minneapolis, 2007
New Lawyer Experience: Success as a Lawyer
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2007
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2007
Annual Intellectual Property Law Conference: Delivering Powerful Opening Statements and Closing Arguments at Trial
American Bar Association, Arlington, 2007
The Genuine Way to Fake an Examination
Minnesota CLE, St. Paul, 2007
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
New Mexico CLE, Albuquerque, 2007
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Arizona CLE, Phoenix, 2007
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE,, 2007
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, New York, 2006
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, Chicago, 2006
Patent Litigation Update
Iowa Intellectual Property Law Association, Des Moines, 2006
Midwest IP Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2006
Pitching the Great Idea or Even the Not So Great Idea
Association of Continuing Legal Education, Kohala Coast, 2006
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Pennsylvania Bar Institute CLE, Pittsburgh, 2006
Powerful Cross Examinations
Pennsylvania Bar Institute CLE, Philadelphia, 2006
How to Conduct Powerful Cross Examinations
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2006
Patent Infringement Investigations
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2006
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2006
Raise Your Corporate Litigation IQ
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
Claim Construction and Proving Infringement
Practising Law Institute, New York, 2005
Understanding the Doctrine of Equivalents
Iowa Intellectual Property Law Association, Cedar Rapids, 2005
Midwest IP Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
Patent Enforcement and Defense
Virginia CLE, Alexandria, 2005
The Power Trial Method Approach to a Jury Trial
Washington CLE, Chelan, 2005
Where Do We Now Stand on the Doctrine of Equivalents
AIPLA, Chicago, 2005
Where Do We Now Stand on the Doctrine of Equivalents
AIPLA, San Francisco, 2005
How to Take Depositions That Change the Direction of a Case
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
New Mexico CLE, Albuquerque, 2005
Introduction to Intellectual Proper Law
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
Smoking Gun in a Civil Trial: Finding and Using It
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
New Lawyer Experience: How to Take and Defend Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2005
Claim Construction: The Current Structure of Legal Analysis
Practising Law Institute CLE, New York, 2004
How to Conduct Powerful Cross Examinations
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2004
Midwest Intellectual Property Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2004
How to Win Your Next Jury Trial
Tennessee CLE, Nashville, 2004
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Virginia CLE, Charlottesville, 2004
Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2004
Advanced Patent Law Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2004
Achieving Excellence — How to Pursue the Dream
Association of Continuing Legal Education, San Antonio, 2004
Mid-Winter Institute: How to Litigate in the Digital Decade
AIPLA, La Quinta, 2004
Raise Your Corporate Litigation IQ
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
How to Use the Power Trial Method to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Colorado CLE, Denver, 2003
Establishing Trial Vision From Day One
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
Midwest Intellectual Property Institute: Power IP Update
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
Patent Litigation Update
Intellectual Property Organization, Washington, 2003
Patent Enforcement and Defense
Washington CLE, Seattle, 2003
What a Mess! Ten Cases You Should Read to Better Understand the Future of the Doctrine of Equivalents
AIPLA CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
Intellectual Property Law for In-House Counsel
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
Patent Enforcement and Defense
Missouri CLE, St. Louis, 2003
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Pennsylvania Bar Institute, Philadelphia, 2003
The Evidence Factor
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
What's the Next Festo?
American Conference Institute, Washington, 2003
What's the Next Festo?
American Conference Institute, San Francisco, 2003
Advanced Patent Law
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
Basic Patent Law
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
The New Lawyer Experience: Tricks and Traps for New Lawyers, Candid Advice for Your First Years of Practice
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2003
Midwest Intellectual Property Institute: CEO Crash Course on Basic IP Law
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2002
A Case Study in the Arbitration of an IP Licensing Dispute
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2002
Patents and Product Protection
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2002
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2002
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
New Jersey CLE, New Brunswick, 2002
Litigation Tactics, Problems and Solutions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2002
New Lawyer Experience: Real-World Ethics and Professionalism
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2002
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Washington CLE, Seattle, 2002
(Really Basic Patent Law for Non-Patent Lawyers
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
Patent Enforcement and Defense: A Guide for Patent Attorneys, Corporate Counsel and General Litigators
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
Basic Training for Intellectual Property Litigation
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Washington CLE, Seattle, 2001
Raise Your Corporate Litigation IQ
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
Introduction to Intellectual Property Litigation
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
What IP Litigators Should Know About the Festo Decisions
Federal Bar Association CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
Leading Damages Cases in Patent Enforcement
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
How to Win Your First, or Next Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
Patent Enforcement and Defense
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2001
Managing and Taking Corporate Discovery
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2000
An Overview of Intellectual Property Litigation
University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis, 2000
Taking and Defending Corporate Depositions
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2000
Protecting Trade Secrets
Minnesota CLE, Minneapolis, 2000
How to Win Your First, (or Next) Jury Trial
Minnesota CLE, St. Paul, 2000

Published Articles

Even Rocket Science Is Not Rocket Science: The Utter Simplicity of a Patent Trial
PLI Patent Litigation 2011, 1061 PLI 479, 2011
You're Killing Me: How to Prevent Your Expert Witness From Destroying Your Patent Case At Trial
PLI Patent Litigation 2011, 1062 PLI 319, 2011
Winning Patent Litigation Casebook
Editor, Faegre & Benson, 2010
The Science, Law and Art of Demonstrative Exhibits in Patent Cases
PLI Patent Litigation 2010, 1021 PLI 397, 2010
The Secret of a Good Bluff Is Not to Bluff: Using Trial Vision to Settle Your Patent Case
PLI Patent Litigation 2009, 982 PLI 361, 2009
Accepting the Consequences of Victory: Could a Broad Claim Construction Invalidate Your Claim on Written Description and Enablement Grounds?
PLI Patent Litigation 2008, 948 PLI 345, 2008
Saying No to De Novo Review: The Federal Circuit Contemplates Revisiting the Appellate Standard of Review for Claim Construction
PLI Patent Litigation 2007, 910 PLI 205, 2007
Wilson Sporting Goods and the Role of the Accused Product in Claim Construction
PLI Patent Litigation 2006, 875 PLI 53, 2006
Claim Construction, Patent Infringement and the Growing Importance of the Claim Vitiation Defense
PLI Patent Litigation 2005, 841 PLI 41, 2005
We Have a Split Decision: Analyzing the Internal Conflicts Within the Federal Circuit on the Issue of Claim Construction
PLI Patent Litigation 2004, 804 PLI 55, 2004
You Must Be Mistaken: Federal Circuit "Corrections" of District Court Claim Constructions
PLI Patent Litigation 2003, 766 PLI 47, 2003
The IP Book
Editor, Minnesota CLE, 2003-11
The Power Trial Method
National Institute for Trial Advocacy, (NITA)

Related Practices

Intellectual Property
Intellectual Property Litigation

Related Industries

Medical Technology

Media Mentions

21-July-2011 - Faegre & Benson Team to Represent 3M in Renewed Patent Suit
28-May-2010 - Gross Quoted on Patent Litigation in Minnesota
12-March-2010 - USA Today Covers Faegre & Benson Seagate Victory
01-December-2009 - David Gross Featured in Minnesota Law and Politics

News

30-April-2013 - Faegre Baker Daniels Lawyers Recognized by Managing IP
21-March-2013 - Faegre Baker Daniels Announces Firmwide Leadership Positions for 2013
26-February-2013 - Faegre Baker Daniels Achieves Dismissal of Patent Infringement Case for 3M
19-October-2012 - 27 Faegre Baker Daniels Partners Recognized as Leading Litigators
27-August-2012 - The Best Lawyers in America Recognizes 187 Faegre Baker Daniels Attorneys
25-July-2012 - Faegre Baker Daniels Attorneys Named to Super Lawyers in Minnesota
26-June-2012 - Faegre Baker Daniels Secures Win for Thomson Reuters
21-June-2012 - David Gross, Natalie Hanlon-Leh, Ken Liebman and Nina Wang Ranked by IAM Among the World's Leading Patent Practitioners
07-June-2012 - Faegre Baker Daniels Practices Ranked Nationally in 2012 Chambers USA
07-May-2012 - Faegre Baker Daniels Wins Patent Jury Trial for Coloplast
13-March-2012 - David Gross and Debbie Ellingboe Named Attorneys of the Year
08-December-2011 - Eight Faegre & Benson Partners Recognized as Leading Benchmark Litigators
28-September-2011 - Faegre & Benson Wins Jury Verdict for Benchmark Electronics
06-September-2011 - Ninety Faegre & Benson Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America
08-July-2011 - Faegre & Benson Scores Significant Victory for Seagate in the United Kingdom
10-June-2011 - Faegre & Benson Practices Ranked Nationally in 2011 Chambers USA
09-May-2011 - Ken Liebman and David Gross Named Among the World's Leading Patent Litigators
10-March-2011 - Faegre & Benson Releases Second Edition of Winning Patent Litigation
16-February-2011 - Faegre & Benson Attorneys Named to Super Lawyers Business Edition
09-August-2010 - Ninety-Three Faegre & Benson Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America
29-June-2010 - Chambers Recognizes Faegre & Benson General Commercial Litigation Practices in Minnesota and Colorado
10-March-2010 - Faegre & Benson Wins Patent Appeal for Seagate
03-August-2009 - Faegre & Benson Attorneys Named to Minnesota Super Lawyers List
31-July-2009 - 96 Faegre & Benson Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America
22-June-2009 - Faegre & Benson Wins National Recognition for Seagate Trial Victory
22-June-2009 - Unique Courtroom Strategy, Winning Record Lands Faegre & Benson Lawyer Top Litigator Status
12-June-2009 - Faegre & Benson Receives Top Chambers Rankings, National Franchise Practice Moves Up
23-February-2009 - David Gross Named an Attorney of the Year
23-January-2009 - Faegre & Benson Wins Comprehensive Permanent Injunction for Global Traffic Technologies
26-December-2008 - Faegre & Benson Wins Defense Verdict in Patent Infringement Trial for Seagate
24-October-2008 - Faegre & Benson Wins Patent Infringement Trial for Global Traffic Technologies
01-October-2008 - The Best Lawyers in America 2009 Includes 90 from Faegre & Benson
14-August-2008 - Faegre & Benson Attorneys Named to Super Lawyers in Minnesota
31-March-2008 - The Best Lawyers in America 2008 Includes 79 from Faegre & Benson
04-March-2008 - Faegre & Benson Attorneys Earn Recognition by Chambers USA
29-January-2007 - Faegre & Benson Wins Patent Appeal for Jiffy Lube International
10-January-2007 - IP Litigation Partner Named One of 50 "Rising Litigation Stars" by The American Lawyer

Court Admissions

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
U.S. Supreme Court

Representative Matters

Represented 3M as National Coordinating Counsel in Breast Implant Litigation
Won $1.9 Million Judgment of Willful Patent Infringement for Floe International
Won $6.75 Million Jury Verdict in Patent Infringement Case for Global Traffic Technologies
Won Complete Defense Verdict for Seagate in a UK Patent Infringement Trial
Won Complete Defense Verdict in Patent Infringement Trial for Seagate Technology
Won Jury Verdict for Benchmark Electronics
Won Summary Judgment for Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Won Summary Judgment for Seagate Technology