May 28, 2015

Stress at Work: An Employer's Liability?

In Easton v B&Q Plc [2015] EWHC 880, the High Court considered whether an employer was liable for an employee’s psychiatric injury caused by work-related stress.

Easton had been a high performing manager at B&Q for 10 years. In 2010, he went off work for several months with depression caused by work-related stress. Upon beginning a phased return to work, he was offered a temporary and less demanding position. The following day he was again signed off sick with depression and never worked at B&Q again. He brought a personal injury claim against B&Q for psychiatric injury (namely depression) caused by work-related stress.

The key question for the High Court was whether B&Q knew, or should reasonably have known, there was a risk that Easton would suffer from psychiatric injury. On the basis that Easton had enjoyed a long-established managerial career and had no history of psychiatric illness, the Court found that the psychiatric injury had not been foreseeable. The Court also found that B&Q could not reasonably have foreseen Easton’s relapse because, at the time, although he had been on medication, he had said he felt ready to return and B&Q had been entitled to take this “at face value”.  Easton’s claim therefore failed.

This is a good result for employers, although it should be noted that the outcome can be very different where an employee brings a disability discrimination claim; the disability legislation is broad and provides significantly greater protection for employees.

The Faegre Baker Daniels website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Baker Daniels' cookies information for more details.