August 2014

Franchisor Wins Permanent Injunction and Damages against Holdover Franchisee Without Need for Evidentiary Hearing

United States - California | United States - North Carolina

A restaurant franchisor defended a lawsuit in North Carolina federal court against a terminated franchisee who continued using the franchisor’s trademarks and violated the non-compete after termination. Faegre Baker Daniels represented the franchisor in this litigation.

The court granted the franchisor’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The court subsequently granted, without an evidentiary hearing, the franchisor’s requests for a permanent injunction, default judgment, contempt sanctions, and an award of Lanham Act treble damages and attorneys' fees.

The Faegre Baker Daniels website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Baker Daniels' cookies information for more details.