Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, a Delaware limited liability partnership | This website contains attorney advertising.
May 10, 2017

Why Chancery Should Reconsider Its Decision in Trulia

By Michael J. Maimone and Joseph C. Schoell

Wilmington partners Michael J. Maimone and Joseph C. Schoell authored “Why Chancery Should Reconsider Its Decision in Trulia” for Law360.

The Delaware Court of Chancery’s decision in In re Trulia Inc. Shareholder Litigation is widely considered to be one of the most notable and impactful rulings for deal litigation in recent memory, garnering significant analysis since being handed down in January 2016.

More than a year later, Mike and Joe reevaluate the ruling’s actual impact, including the filings of securities class actions in federal courts, the decrease in actions filed in Delaware, and some notable decisions affected by Trulia.

Read “Why Chancery Should Reconsider Its Decision in Trulia.”

Full Article

The material contained in this communication is informational, general in nature and does not constitute legal advice. The material contained in this communication should not be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances. This communication was published on the date specified and may not include any changes in the topics, laws, rules or regulations covered. Receipt of this communication does not establish an attorney-client relationship. In some jurisdictions, this communication may be considered attorney advertising.

The Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP website uses cookies to make your browsing experience as useful as possible. In order to have the full site experience, keep cookies enabled on your web browser. By browsing our site with cookies enabled, you are agreeing to their use. Review Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP's cookies information for more details.